Data Protection as a Goal of EU Competition Law Nağme Gürpınar  - Kitap

Data Protection as a Goal of EU Competition Law

1. Baskı, 
Temmuz 2026
Kitabın Detayları
Dili:
İngilizce
Ebat:
16x24
Sayfa:
61
Barkod:
9786258585834
Kapak Türü:
Karton Kapaklı
Yayınevi:
Fiyatı:
250,00
Temin süresi 2-3 gündür.
Kitabın Açıklaması
Data Protection as a Goal of EU Competition Law examines the relationship between European Union competition law and data protection in the context of the digital economy.
The book explores the impact of data use on competition, the role of personal data protection within competition law, and the interaction between these two areas of EU law. It offers valuable insights into contemporary legal debates surrounding digital platforms, data-driven markets, and the protection of individual data rights.
The work provides a useful reference for legal scholars, practitioners, academics, and students interested in EU law, competition law, and data protection.
Kitabın Konu Başlıkları
.
Introduction
.
Facebook v. Germany Case
.
The Goals of EU Competition Law
.
The Role of Data in Competition Law and Interplay Between Data Protection and Competition Law
.
Conclusion
Kitapla İlgili Kategoriler
Kitabın İçindekileri
PREFACE III 
TABLE OF CONTENTS V 
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS VII 
ÖZET IX 
ABSTRACT IX 
1. Introduction: 1 
2. Facebook v. Germany Case: 3 
I) Decision of the Federal Cartel Office(‘Bundeskartelamt’): 3 
a) Statement of Facts: 3 
b) Legal Assessment of Federal Cartel Office: 4 
II) Decision of Federal Court of Justice: 7 
3. The Goals of EU Competition Law: 11 
I) More Economic Approach: 13 
II) Ordoliberal Approach: 15 
III) Commission’s Perspective: 20 
4. The Role of Data in Competition Law and Interplay Between Data Protection and Competition Law: 23 
I) Role of Data in the Digital Economy: 23 
II) Potential Competition Problems with Regard to Data: 26 
III) The Goals of Data Protection Law and Intersection with those of Competition Law: 30 
IV)uation of Competition Law Infringement Inferred from Data Protection Law–Facebook v. Germany Case: 34 
V) Competences of Authorities and Risk of Double Enforcement: 36 
VI) Argue Going Forward: 38 
5. Conclusion: 45 
BIBLIOGRAPHY: 47