Recognizing Artıfıcıal Intelligence As The Inventor in Patent Law Zehra Hamide Gürbüz Önal - Kitap

Recognizing Artıfıcıal Intelligence As The Inventor in Patent Law

1. Baskı, 
Mayıs 2025
Kitabın Detayları
Dili:
Türkçe
Ebat:
16x24
Sayfa:
150
Barkod:
9786255569592
Kapak Türü:
Karton Kapaklı
Yayınevi:
Platon Hukuk Yayınevi
Fiyatı:
295,00₺
Temin süresi 2-3 gündür.
Kitabın Açıklaması
This book not only analyzes judicial decisions but also offers essential background for understanding the topic: What exactly is artificial intelligence? What is machine learning? Why has the debate around AI inventorship become so intense, and how have media narratives and commercial interests amplified it?
As Andrew Ng has noted, AI is becoming a transformative, general-purpose technology — "the new electricity." Yet the author argues that AI, for now and the foreseeable future, remains a sophisticated tool rather than a source of independent creativity. The legal system must assess AI's role thoughtfully, without attributing human qualitiesoverstating its capabilities.
This book is an essential read for legal professionals, technologists, and anyone interested in the intersection of law and emerging technologies. With clarity and depth, it invites readers to consider where AI fits within the innovation ecosystem — and where it does not.
Yorumlar
Kitabın İçindekileri
TABLE OF CONTENTS 
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 9 
INTRODUCTION . 11 
CHAPTER ONE 
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) 
CHRONOLOGICAL OVERVIEW OF AI. 15 
A) The History That Builds and Defines AI . 15 
Understanding AI: Algorithm 22 
Definition of AI 27 
Human Intelligence and Machine Intelligence . 32 
B) Machine Learning (ML) 35 
Definition of ML 35 
Types of ML . 38 
Supervised Learning (SL) 38 
Unsupervised Learning (USL) . 38 
Reinforced Learning (RL) 39 
Deep Learning (DL) . 40 
Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) 41 
Examples of DL . 42 
Evolutionary Computing (Programming) 42 
AI TODAY 45 
A) Artificial Narrow Intelligence (ANI) 45 
B) The Benefits of ANI 47 
III. FUTURE OF AI 47 
A) Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) 47 
B) Artificial Super Intelligence (ASI) 50 
CHAPTER TWO 
RELAVANT CONCEPTS IN PATENT LAW AND PATENTABILITY OF AI SYSTEMS AND INVENTIONS OVERVIEW OF PATENT LAW 51 
A) Etymology and History . 52 
Turkish Patent Law 53 
History of Turkish Patent Law . 53 
The Recent Law . 54 
International Legislation 54 
B) Invention and Inventor . 55 
Invention . 55 
Invention in Turkish Law . 55 
Invention in Europe and Other Jurisdictions . 57 
Inventor 57 
Inventor in Turkish Law . 58 
Inventor in Europe and Other Jurisdictions . 59 
C) Patentability Criteria 60 
Novelty . 61 
“State of Art” in Novelty 61 
Explanation of Novelty with an Example 63 
Inventive Step (Non–Obviousness) 65 
“State of Art” in Inventive Step . 66 
Exceptions of “State of Art” inuating Inventive Step 66 
First Exception: Unpublished Patent Applications 66 
Second Exception: The Related Area 67 
Expert in the Field . 67 
Determining the Inventive Step: “Problem–Solution” Approach . 67 
Industrial Applicability 69 
PATENTABILITY OF AI SYSTEMS AND AI INVENTIONS . 70 
A) Patentability of Computer Software 71 
B) Patentability of AI Systems . 73 
C) Patentability of AI Inventions 74 
Disclosure of AI . 74 
Global Cooperation on AI 75 
Inventorship of AI 75 
Patent Law Term “The Skilled Person” and AI . 75 
CHAPTER THREE 
AI AS AN INVENTOR RECENT ADVANCEMENT of AI APPLICATIONS in DIFFERENT SECTORS . 77 
RECOGNIZING AI: DIFFERENT APROACHES FOR PERSONALITY . 79 
A) Electronic Personality 80 
B) Attorney/Representative Approach . 81 
C) Artificial Human Approach . 82 
D) Slavery Approach 82 
III. THE DABUS CASE: THE EARLY CROWING ROOSTER 83 
A) What Is DABUS? 84 
B) The Artificial Inventor Project (AIP) 87 
C) DABUS Patent Applications . 88 
D) Rejection of DABUS Patent Applications 94 
Decision in UK on DABUS Application . 94 
Decision of EPO on DABUS Application . 96 
Decision in US on DABUS Application 97 
Other PCT Countries: Australia, Germany, South Africa 100 
Decision in Australia on DABUS Application 102 
Decision in Germany on DABUS Application 103 
Decision in South Africa on DABUS Application 104 
CHAPTER FOUR 
FUTURE OF PATENT LAW REGARDING AI FUTURE OF PATENT LAW 105 
A) Can AI Be Recognized As Inventor 106 
Arguments of the Positive Perspective . 108 
Argument One: Current System Discourage Honesty . 109 
Argument Two: Incentivise Innovation . 110 
Argument Three: Reform in Patent Law Is 
Indispensable . 110 
Argument Four: Society Will Be the Owner of the 
Invention 110 
Arguments of the Negative Perspective . 111 
Argument One: Opponents of IPR Protection . 111 
Argument Two: Opponents of Pre–acceptance 111 
Argument Three: Inventiveness is Unique to Human 
Being 112 
B) Can AI Invent? . 112 
C) About the AI Inventions Cited in the Literature 114 
Circuit Designs By John Koza’s “Invention Machine” . 114 
“Oral–B Cross Action Tooth Brush” by “Creativity 
Machine” 115 
“Food Receipt” By Contest Winner Watson’s Jeopardy . 115 
“Nose Cone” by Hitachi Company 116 
“Fractal Food Container” and “Devices and Methods for 
Attracting Enhanced Attention” by DABUS . 116 
The NASA Antenna . 116 
“Digital Twin” Car Suspension by Siemens 117 
Robot Eve in Medical Field . 117 
D) Anthropomorphism in AI 118 
CONCLUSION . 121 
ABSTRACT . 125 
ÖZET . 127 
BIBLIOGRAPHY . 129 
LINKS 148 
LIST OF FIGURES 150 
HakkımızdaUluslararası Yayınevi BelgesiKaynakça Dosyası Kişisel Verilerin Korunması ÜyelikSiparişlerimİade Politikasıİletişim
 
Ana Sayfa
Kategori
Sipariş
Sepetim
Profil