I. Research Background
19
II. Research aims and questions
29
III. Research Methodologies
29
IV. Outline and Structure of Thesis
32
CHARACTERİSTİCS OF THE CONSUMERONLİNE CONSUMER – IN LAW AND POLİCY
II. The Importance of Consumer Protection
33
A. Historical Evolution of the European Union Consumer Policy
33
B. Justification of Consumer Protection
43
III. The Notion of Consumer
48
A. The General Definition of Consumer
48
B. Who is Considered a Consumer?
50
C. Non–Legal Definition of Consumer
51
D. Legal Definition of Consumer
53
IV. Vulnerability of Consumer
61
V. Concept of Online Consumer
66
A. Who is the Online Consumer?
66
1. What is E–commerce?
67
a) The Definition of E–commerce
68
b) Different Types of E–commerce
69
c) Understanding the Benefit of E–commerce to Consumers
72
B. The Nature of Online Consumer
73
C. Economic Impact of Online Consumers in the European Union, United
D. The Current Issues to Online Consumer
79
ONLİNE DİSPUTE RESOLUTİON FOR CROSS–BORDER CONSUMER DİSPUTES: ONLİNE ARBİTRATİON
II. Dispute Resolution Mechanism
84
1. Challenges of Traditional Dispute Resolution
86
B. Alternative Dispute Resolution
89
a) Characteristics of Arbitration
98
i) Arbitrator as an Impartial Third Party
98
iii) Finality of Award
101
iv) Enforceability of Award
103
b) Compared Mediation with Arbitration
104
C. Online Dispute Resolution
107
1. The Current State of Türkiye’s ODR Platform
111
a) Consumer Arbitration Committees
111
a) Functionating of the EU ODR platform
114
b) An Analysis of the EU ODR Platform
116
i) Inadequacy in Conformity to ODR Regulation Conditions
116
ii) Limitation of the Platform Regarding Dealing with
Fragmentation and how it Affects Consumers
118
iii) Low Participation of Businesses on the ODR Platform
120
iv) Lack of Enforcement Mechanism
122
III. Online Arbitration for Cross–Border Dispute
126
A. Definition and Mechanism of Online Arbitration for Cross– Border D
B. Benefits of Online Arbitration for Cross–Border Disputes
128
1. Accessibility and Convenience
128
2. Cost–effectiveness
128
IV. The Interaction between Digital Technology and Arbitration
134
A. How can Digital Technology be Employed in Arbitration?
134
1. Online case management systems
135
2. Video conferencing
136
V. The function of online arbitration
138
A. The existence and validity of online arbitration agreement
138
B. Appointment of online arbitrator
143
C. The Legal Significance of the Place of Online Arbitration
150
D. The Complexity of Applicable Law in Online Arbitration
153
E. The commencement of online arbitrator process
157
F. The issuance of an online arbitral award
161
VI. Challenges of Online Arbitration
164
A. Practical Challenges in Online Arbitration: Cybersecurity, Privacy and
B. Legal Challenges in Online Arbitration: Due Process, the Validity of Online
Arbitration Agreement and Arbitrability of an Online Consumer Dispute
173
2. The Validity of Online Arbitration Agreement
181
3. Arbitrability of Online Consumer Dispute
184
ARBİTRABİLİTY OF SUBJECT–MATTER UNDER INTERNATİONAL AND NATİONAL LAW: CONSUMER DİSPUTE
II. General Principle of Arbitrability
190
A. Objective and Subjective Arbitrability
193
1. Objective Arbitrability
193
2. Subjective Arbitrability
197
III. Arbitrability as a Condition for the Validity of an Arbitration
Agreementment for the Jurisdiction of the
IV. Who Should Decide on Subject–Matter Arbitrability? The Principle of
Separability and the Principle of Competence and Competence
201
A. The Principle of Separability
201
B. The Principle of Competence–Competence
205
V. Subject–matter Arbitrability under the International and
A. Arbitrability under International Law
208
1. Arbitrability under the New York Convention
208
2. Arbitrability under the UNCITRAL Model Law
214
3. Uniform international legislation on arbitrability
218
B. National legislations to Subject–matter Arbitrability: Türkiye, Germany,
England, and France's law
221
1. Türkiye’s Approaches to Arbitrability
221
2. Germany’s Approaches to Arbitrability
227
3. France's Approaches to Arbitrability
233
4. England and Wales Approaches to Arbitrability
237
5. Uniform national law on arbitrability
241
ARE BUSİNESS–TO–CONSUMER ARBİTRATİON CLAUSES VALİD UNDER THE EU, ENGLAND AND WALES, AND TÜRKİYE LEGAL FRAMEWORK?
II. The effect of EU Regulation on Arbitration Agreements in
A. Unfair Term Directive 93/13 as Substantive Law on the Consumer
Arbitration Agreement
249
1. Consumer Contracts
252
a) Consumer capacity in the form of unique protection in EU
Consumer arbitrations
252
2. Protection of the Weaker Party to the Online Standard Consumer
Contract: Substantive Justice
258
a) Substantive validity ment to the online arbitration
i) Online arbitration clause in standard contracts
264
A) Validity of consumer arbitration clauses in the browse–
B) Validity of consumer arbitration clauses in Clickwrap
3. Essential Elements of Consumer Arbitration Clause Agreement:
Imbalance Power and Good– Faith
279
a) The Uniqueness of Consumer Arbitration Clause Agreement:
i) Potential cause of the lack of bargain power
280
A) Unequal information
281
B) Standardised terms
282
C) Cost of arbitration
284
E) Unequal Negotiation Power
288
ii) Solution to challenges
292
A) Enhancing consumer awareness
292
B) Cost Control and Legal Assistance
294
C) Model arbitration clauses
299
iii) Does Freedom of Contract naturalise the imbalance powered
between B2C in the EU?
316
b) The Interaction between Good Faith, and Consumer
i) Overview of Good Faith Principle in the Contracts
318
ii) Good Faith in Consumer Arbitration Agreements
320
VI. Validity of Online Arbitration Clause under the Turkish Laws
325
B. The issue of the online consumer arbitration clause
329
TRANSPARENCY OF CONSUMER ARBİTRATİON CLAUSE İN THE ONLİNE BUSİNESS–TO–CONSUMER CONTRACTS.
II. The Law Applicable to Online Arbitration Clauses
339
A. The Law on Consent to Arbitrate
339
B. Consent Based on Subjective vs Objective Standard
342
C. EU Laws Applicable to Online Arbitration Clauses
343
III. Transparency ments in Online Arbitration Clauses
347
A. Clear and Comprehensible Language
347
B. Prominent Display and Accessibility of Terms
349
C. Clear and Informed Consent
352
D. The Right to WithdrawOpt Out
355
IV. Challenges and Best Practices in Ensuring Transparency
357
A. Clickwrap vs. Browsewrap Contracts
357
B. Balancing Business Interests and Consumer Protection
360
C. Integrating EU ments into Website Design and Contract Formation 363
D. The Role of Alternative Dispute Resolution and Consumer Arbitration
366
V. Case Studies and Jurisprudence on Transparency of Online
A. European Court of Justice Cases on Transparency of Contractual Terms
369
B. Lessons and Best Practices for Online Arbitration Clause in the Industry
373
1. Uber Case on Online Arbitration Clause
374
a) Meyer v. Uber Technologies Case
374
b) Cullinane v. Uber Technologies Case:
376
VI. AI in Search of Unfair Arbitration Clauses in Online
CONCLUSİON – ANALYSİS AND DİSCUSSİON – DRAWİNG OUT SOLUTİONS
AND POTENTİAL PATHWAYS TO THE FUTURE OF CONSUMER ARBİTRATİON.
II. Analysis and Discussion
385
A. The Legal Capacity of the Consumer
389
B. Applicable Law and Rule
390
C. Procedural Fairness
391
III. Drawing out Solutions and Potential Pathways to the Future of
A. Uniform Regulation
395
1. Uniform Rules on the Arbitrability of Online Consumer Disputes
397
2. Create a Consensus on the Legality of Online Arbitration Agreements
399
B. Enhance Online Arbitration’s Procedural Fairness
401
IV. Future Recommendations
404